| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 12.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 97.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Fujitsu CELSIUS R940 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | FUJITSU D3358-A1 |
| Memory | 13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190729 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | May 16 '21 at 09:35 |
| Run Duration | 113 Seconds |
| Run User | GRC-User |
| Background CPU | 3% |
PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
|
68.3%
Good
|
67% 119 Pts
|
61% 516 Pts
|
168% 2,710 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia Quadro K4000
Nvidia(10DE 097C) 3GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1404 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 456.71
|
12.8%
Very poor
|
12% 17.4 fps
|
15% 18.7 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 323 307 305 304 303 MB/s
|
97.6%
Outstanding
|
90% 400 MB/s
|
142% 48.1 MB/s
|
264% 354 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hynix HMA41GR7MFR8N-TF 2x8GB
2 of 16 slots used
16GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
37.6%
Below average
|
36% 12.8 GB/s
|
34% 12 GB/s
|
41% 97.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical CELSIUS R940 Builds (Compare 35 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Fujitsu CELSIUS R940
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 v31stBench 63%, 481 samples | 10x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v31stBench 63%, 2,624 samples | 3x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v31stBench 64%, 1,710 samples | 3x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 9x |
| Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples | 5x |
| Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples | 4x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 54% - Above average | Total price: $238 |