Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 24% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	27.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E1-2100 APU 4,569 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	23.4% Poor	Memory 41.8 1-Core 15.2 2-Core 30 21% 29 Pts	4-Core 30.9 8-Core 29.9 4% 30.4 Pts	64-Core 29.1 2% 29.1 Pts
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 23.4% Great: 26%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 8210 4,832 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 0834) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02 Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	0.97% Terrible	Lighting 1 Reflection 2.3 Parallax 1.4 1% 1.57 fps	MRender 2 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 2 1% 1.5 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.97% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Ebda T1 SSD 120GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 86GB free (System drive) Firmware: DA SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 95 114 111 123 123 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	27.7% Poor	Read 291 Write 124 Mixed 110 SusWrite 110 35% 159 MB/s	4K Read 12 4K Write 11.6 4K Mixed 4.5 30% 9.37 MB/s	DQ Read 15.4 DQ Write 14.9 DQ Mixed 6.3 7% 12.2 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 27.7% Great: 80%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-YK0 1x4GB 3,608 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	12.1% Very poor	MC Read 4.3 MC Write 3 MC Mixed 4.4 11% 3.9 GB/s	SC Read 3.5 SC Write 3.3 SC Mixed 4.3 11% 3.7 GB/s	Latency 194 21% 194 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 12.1% Great: 33%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 20%

Surfboard

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
E1-2100 APUAMDBench 17%, 4,569 samples	6x

GPU
HD 8210AMDBench 1%, 4,832 samples	6x

SSD
SSDNow UV400 120GBKingston $35Bench 67%, 80,916 samples	1x

RAM
HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 19,285 samples	1x
ACR16D3LS1NGG/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 28%, 2,133 samples	1x
M471B5273EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 29%, 749 samples	1x

Value: 11% - Very poor

Total price: $35

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16