ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409DAP_M409DA

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	93.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409DAP_M409DA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X409DAP
Memory	0.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200108
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 17 '21 at 14:54
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon Silver 3050U Graphics 5,719 User benchmarks, average bench 35% FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	32.2% Below average	Memory 38.2 1-Core 70.6 2-Core 130 44% 79.7 Pts	4-Core 144 8-Core 187 21% 166 Pts	64-Core 194 12% 194 Pts
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 32.2% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics 17,211 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Asus(1043 10A2) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.44.05 Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	1.59% Terrible	Lighting 1.5 Reflection 3.2 Parallax 1.9 1% 2.2 fps	MRender 2.4 Gravity 1.4 Splatting 4.1 2% 2.63 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.59% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
V-gen09sm20ar128sdknvme 128GB 128GB 43 User benchmarks, average bench 155% 38GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0901A3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 407 452 172 78 95 85 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	93.7% Outstanding	Read 623 Write 521 Mixed 518 SusWrite 215 105% 469 MB/s	4K Read 41 4K Write 86.3 4K Mixed 27.2 143% 51.5 MB/s	DQ Read 329 DQ Write 283 DQ Mixed 297 225% 303 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 93.7% Great: 199%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB 452,134 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 845GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 116 120 122 123 120 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	55.7% Above average	Read 75 Write 110 Mixed 56.7 SusWrite 119 66% 90.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 55.7% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GB 48,985 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	25.8% Poor	MC Read 6.6 MC Write 8 MC Mixed 13.2 26% 9.27 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 8.2 21% 7.33 GB/s	Latency 211 19% 211 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 25.8% Great: 41%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409DAP_M409DA Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409DAP_M409DA

CPU
Athlon Silver 3050U GraphicsAMDBench 35%, 5,719 samples	19x
Ryzen 3 3250U GraphicsAMDBench 38%, 10,258 samples	15x
Athlon Gold 3150U GraphicsAMDBench 45%, 2,359 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon GraphicsAMDBench 4%, 17,211 samples	34x
Radeon Vega 3 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 27,821 samples	1x

SSD
MZVLQ512HALU-00000 512GBSamsungBench 136%, 14,873 samples	8x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 134%, 10,140 samples	5x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1202 256GBWDCBench 145%, 4,206 samples	3x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples	12x
M471A5244CB0-CTD Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 8GBSamsungBench 58%, 6,259 samples	8x
4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 8GBMicronBench 56%, 1,078 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback