Today's hottest deals

HP EliteBook 820 G3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 96% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemHP EliteBook 820 G3  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 807C
Memory5.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201020
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateMay 24 '21 at 14:21
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU7%
CPU Throttled 96%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6300U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
61.8% Good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 88.7
2-Core 163
67% 112 Pts
4-Core 228
8-Core 239
31% 234 Pts
64-Core 232
14% 232 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
HP(103C 807C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9466
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
4.76% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 3.2
Parallax 6
4% 4.83 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 5.5
Splatting 8.5
6% 6.63 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.76%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN256HCHP-000H1 256GB
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT22H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 107 87 81 82 84 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Read 394
Write 134
Mixed 157
SusWrite 88.3
42% 193 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 67.2
4K Mixed 24.4
103% 38.5 MB/s
DQ Read 31.7
DQ Write 96.2
DQ Mixed 30.8
33% 52.9 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB0-CPB M471A5244BB0-CRC 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
52.6% Above average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 15.8
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 15.7
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 820 G3 Builds (Compare 1,275 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 820 G3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback