Today's hottest deals

Apple MacBookAir7,2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.62% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive158% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemApple MacBookAir7,2  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-937CB26E2E02BB01
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 29 '21 at 04:13
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Memory 82
1-Core 87.4
2-Core 146
64% 105 Pts
4-Core 209
8-Core 213
28% 211 Pts
64-Core 213
13% 213 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 6000 (Mobile)
Apple(106B 011B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4240
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
6.62% Terrible
Lighting 8.7
Reflection 9.5
Parallax 9.1
7% 9.1 fps
MRender 6.2
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 7.2
6% 6.9 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.62%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple SM0256G PCIe 251GB
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW3SA0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 719 815 735 829 732 675 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
158% Outstanding
Read 1,304
Write 944
Mixed 629
SusWrite 751
202% 907 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 93
4K Mixed 34
134% 51.4 MB/s
DQ Read 486
DQ Write 371
DQ Mixed 423
318% 427 MB/s
Poor: 92%
This bench: 158%
Great: 203%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x45424A3230554638454455302D474E2D4620 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
54.3% Above average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 17.5
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 17.1
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 77
52% 77 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacBookAir7,2 Builds (Compare 281 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Apple MacBookAir7,2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback