Asus ROG Strix GL10CS_GL10CS

Performance Results


Gaming 68% Battle cruiser	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 55% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	94.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus ROG Strix GL10CS_GL10CS (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK GL10CS
Memory	5.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190522
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	May 30 '21 at 08:01
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	50%

Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$96 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	70.8% Very good	Memory 78.5 1-Core 102 2-Core 200 72% 127 Pts	4-Core 353 8-Core 426 50% 390 Pts	64-Core 483 30% 483 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 70.8% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% Asus(1043 210B) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.09 Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	94.3% Outstanding	Lighting 114 Reflection 102 Parallax 116 93% 111 fps	MRender 158 Gravity 113 Splatting 97.2 97% 123 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 94.3% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60 162,275 User benchmarks, average bench 156% 60GB free (System drive) Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 142 55 40 11 63 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 1079 Write 779 Mixed 724 SusWrite 96.2 149% 670 MB/s	4K Read 24.5 4K Write 62.6 4K Mixed 32.6 112% 39.9 MB/s	DQ Read 331 DQ Write 524 DQ Mixed 220 225% 358 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 209%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 605GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 155 155 155 154 154 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	90.1% Outstanding	Read 160 Write 106 Mixed 77.2 SusWrite 154 91% 124 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 90.1% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GB 29,586 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	55.5% Above average	MC Read 21.6 MC Write 21.1 MC Mixed 21.9 62% 21.5 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 9.7 SC Mixed 5.2 20% 7.17 GB/s	Latency 83.3 48% 83.3 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 96%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG Strix GL10CS_GL10CS Builds (Compare 1,664 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 80%

Battleship

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

System: Asus ROG Strix GL10CS_GL10CS

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $96Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	702x
Core i7-9700KIntel $260Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	451x
Core i5-9400Intel $161Bench 86%, 22,187 samples	248x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $294Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	269x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	265x
GTX 1660Nvidia $200Bench 68%, 230,793 samples	249x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	338x
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ 256GBKingstonBench 96%, 18,615 samples	142x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 141%, 16,774 samples	90x

RAM
HMA81GU6CJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 80%, 9,970 samples	208x
HMA81GU6CJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 44%, 10,608 samples	138x
M378A1K43CB2-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 43%, 19,029 samples	128x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $450

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16