Samsung 550XDA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics18.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive236% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSamsung 550XDA  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP550XDA-KS3BR
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210410
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 02 '21 at 02:50
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Memory 67.9
1-Core 162
2-Core 336
98% 189 Pts
4-Core 556
8-Core 627
77% 591 Pts
64-Core 631
39% 631 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Sanyo(144D C195) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9030
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
18.1% Very poor
Lighting 25.8
Reflection 26.6
Parallax 28.9
21% 27.1 fps
MRender 21.8
Gravity 29.3
Splatting 0.2
12% 17.1 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
NE-1TB 1TB
885GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0709A3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1347 1361 1333 1369 1287 1323 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
236% Outstanding
Read 1,550
Write 1,386
Mixed 942
SusWrite 1,337
293% 1,304 MB/s
4K Read 41.5
4K Write 178
4K Mixed 24
188% 81.1 MB/s
DQ Read 780
DQ Write 989
DQ Mixed 504
486% 758 MB/s
Poor: 133%
This bench: 236%
Great: 236%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
43% Average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 11.8
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 13.9
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 43%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 550XDA Builds (Compare 1,492 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 550XDA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $251WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback