Asrock B460M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics15.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock B460M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200810
Uptime4.2 Days
Run DateJun 04 '21 at 12:24
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400F-$95
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Memory 90.2
1-Core 125
2-Core 249
87% 155 Pts
4-Core 487
8-Core 792
78% 639 Pts
64-Core 1,021
63% 1,021 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 466.47
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Lighting 21.7
Reflection 26.8
Parallax 21.5
18% 23.3 fps
MRender 26.1
Gravity 23.4
Splatting 0.1
12% 16.5 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SDEZS25-120G-Z01 120GB
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EE4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 136 14 19 34 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
30.3% Below average
Read 441
Write 47.6
Mixed 218
SusWrite 54.7
41% 190 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.9
35% 7.83 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 53%
Luminoutek 480GB 480GB
278GB free
Firmware: T0910A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 358 70 318 77 260 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Read 474
Write 432
Mixed 381
SusWrite 253
86% 385 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 20.7
130% 53.6 MB/s
DQ Read 100
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 28.9
75% 152 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905625-004.A03LF 8ATF1G64AZ-2G1B1 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
71.8% Very good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 20.9
74% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 24.5
SC Mixed 19.9
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 67
60% 67 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B460M Pro4 Builds (Compare 2,643 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock B460M Pro4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $393
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback