Asus Rampage III GENE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics27.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus Rampage III GENE  (all builds)
Memory8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110920
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJun 04 '21 at 21:48
Run Duration263 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$90
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
66.8% Good
Memory 89.5
1-Core 70.8
2-Core 138
62% 99.4 Pts
4-Core 241
8-Core 342
37% 292 Pts
64-Core 347
22% 347 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280-$185
PwrHis(1787 3000) 3GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.5% Poor
Lighting 36.5
Reflection 31.6
Parallax 48.2
30% 38.8 fps
MRender 27.7
Gravity 37.8
Splatting 21.6
23% 29 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 34%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120 GB 120GB
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE3000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 24 11 39 15 22 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.2% Poor
Read 187
Write 69
Mixed 86.2
SusWrite 24.2
20% 91.6 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 14.9
4K Mixed 17.1
55% 16.2 MB/s
DQ Read 19.4
DQ Write 24.4
DQ Mixed 18.2
15% 20.7 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 55%
C400-mtf DDAC064MAM 64GB
14GB free
Firmware: 0309
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 69 70 74 75 75 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 357
Write 104
Mixed 153
SusWrite 72.4
38% 171 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 38.9
4K Mixed 15.2
72% 25 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 86.1
DQ Mixed 30.6
45% 85.1 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 60%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$23
113GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 68 71 69 69 67 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
51% Above average
Read 110
Write 110
Mixed 70.1
SusWrite 68
66% 89.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 51%
Great: 70%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$23
113GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 68 71 69 69 67 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
41% Average
Read 74.2
Write 72.9
Mixed 52
SusWrite 68.2
49% 66.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 41%
Great: 70%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$23
173GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 117 118 119 119 118 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 58.3
Write 61.8
Mixed 47.6
SusWrite 118
52% 71.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 70%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$23
117GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 24 14 41 17 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
35.5% Below average
Read 96.9
Write 89.2
Mixed 62.9
SusWrite 26.5
51% 68.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
645GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 111 108 111 111 111 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
54% Above average
Read 77.9
Write 80.1
Mixed 57
SusWrite 110
60% 81.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 54%
Great: 68%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
432GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 148 147 149 150 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Read 156
Write 155
Mixed 72.6
SusWrite 149
97% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
238% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 109%
WD 3200AAJ External 320GB
298GB free, PID 1001
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Read 32.2
Write 28
Mixed 26.2
SusWrite 20.7
36% 26.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
98% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 22%
WD 3200AAJ External 320GB
254GB free, PID 1001
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Read 31.9
Write 27.4
Mixed 26.8
SusWrite 20.4
35% 26.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x2GB
6 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
43.1% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 15.9
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 11.8
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Rampage III GENE Builds (Compare 307 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus Rampage III GENE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $211
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback