| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 28.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 33.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus PRIME H310M-K R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20200331 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 12 '21 at 18:20 |
| Run Duration | 151 Seconds |
| Run User | TUR-User |
| Background CPU | 56% |
PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
68.9%
Good
|
70% 124 Pts
|
50% 391 Pts
|
28% 453 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Asus(1043 8772) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.77
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.5%
Poor
|
28% 31.4 fps
|
30% 38.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$52
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 49 0.7 65 13 1 MB/s
|
33.2%
Below average
|
49% 220 MB/s
|
38% 12.9 MB/s
|
44% 75.1 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47
257GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 71 69 70 70 70 MB/s
|
46.7%
Average
|
54% 73.3 MB/s
|
134% 1.03 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 99U5702-094.A00G 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
44.4%
Average
|
45% 15.6 GB/s
|
34% 12 GB/s
|
46% 86.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical PRIME H310M-K R2.0 Builds (Compare 7,089 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus PRIME H310M-K R2.0
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 3,203x |
| Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 1,501x |
| Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples | 460x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 723x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 563x |
| RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 514x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Excellent | Total price: $359 |