Asrock A320M/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics53.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock A320M/ac  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200716
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJun 23 '21 at 14:26
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$84
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Memory 79.2
1-Core 145
2-Core 280
91% 168 Pts
4-Core 515
8-Core 818
82% 666 Pts
64-Core 974
60% 974 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5500-XT-$217
ASRock(1849 5119) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.12.1
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Lighting 70.5
Reflection 68.7
Parallax 107
58% 82.2 fps
MRender 54.5
Gravity 72.1
Splatting 43.3
45% 56.6 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU750 256GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: XA003R17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 26 31 28 33 29 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30% Below average
Read 52
Write 126
Mixed 136
SusWrite 35.3
20% 87.4 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 53
4K Mixed 6.7
86% 30.8 MB/s
DQ Read 52.1
DQ Write 30.3
DQ Mixed 119
68% 67.1 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 30%
Great: 106%
Drevo X1 pro 1TB
232GB free
Firmware: Q0810B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 409 381 398 413 385 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 406
Mixed 330
SusWrite 398
92% 409 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 33.2
130% 52.8 MB/s
DQ Read 265
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 224
184% 262 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$50
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
80.1% Excellent
MC Read 32.7
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 31.7
82% 28.9 GB/s
SC Read 24
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 27.8
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 82
49% 82 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 27: 1R 5G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
27% 34% 38 102 1 60 24" 1920 1080 DELA08B DELL S2440L
History: Score 48: 6R 3G 9B | Score 27: 1R 5G 7B
Typical A320M/ac Builds (Compare 1,751 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock A320M/ac

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $293
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback