Acer Nitro N50-610

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	97.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Acer Nitro N50-610 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Nitro N50-610
Memory	3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200713
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Jun 26 '21 at 09:23
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-10400F-$98 153,026 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	83.6% Excellent	Memory 80.6 1-Core 129 2-Core 253 85% 154 Pts	4-Core 465 8-Core 754 75% 610 Pts	64-Core 990 61% 990 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 83.6% Great: 92%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLQ256 256GB 755 User benchmarks, average bench 129% 49GB free (System drive) Firmware: FXV7000Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 132 137 129 137 139 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	97.1% Outstanding	Read 970 Write 130 Mixed 193 SusWrite 136 77% 357 MB/s	4K Read 31.1 4K Write 76.5 4K Mixed 36.5 134% 48 MB/s	DQ Read 249 DQ Write 140 DQ Mixed 169 132% 186 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 97.1% Great: 185%
Hkvsn ESSD-T200N/256G 256GB 55 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 238GB free Firmware: 2210 SusWrite @10s intervals: 355 354 355 355 353 351 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	68.3% Good	Read 392 Write 352 Mixed 331 SusWrite 354 80% 357 MB/s	4K Read 20.7 4K Write 37.5 4K Mixed 21.1 78% 26.4 MB/s	DQ Read 164 DQ Write 148 DQ Mixed 48.1 66% 120 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 68%
SanDisk Ultra 123GB 198 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 46GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.8 9.8 9.9 9.8 10 10 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	8.66% Terrible	Read 12.7 Write 8.2 Mixed 11.2 SusWrite 9.9 14% 10.5 MB/s	4K Read 2.8 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 1 89% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 8.66% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR26D4U9S8ME-8 1x8GB 3,004 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	41.2% Average	MC Read 16.6 MC Write 13.6 MC Mixed 11.2 39% 13.8 GB/s	SC Read 12.2 SC Write 14 SC Mixed 13.4 38% 13.2 GB/s	Latency 79.5 50% 79.5 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 41.2% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 52: 8R 2G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
52%	33%	49	153	119	144	0"	1920 1080

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Nitro N50-610 Builds (Compare 3,267 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 41%

Speed boat

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 37%

Jet ski

System: Acer Nitro N50-610

CPU
Core i5-10400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 153,026 samples	2,249x
Core i5-10400Intel $99Bench 84%, 71,804 samples	506x
Core i7-10700Intel $233Bench 93%, 71,010 samples	460x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	1,361x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $239Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	835x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	228x

SSD
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1014 512GBWDCBench 168%, 18,999 samples	461x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1014 512GBWDCBench 169%, 12,303 samples	363x
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1 256GBKingstonBench 100%, 13,793 samples	168x

RAM
ACR26D4U9S1KA-4 ACR26D4U9S8ME-8 12GBKingstonBench 56%, 475 samples	196x
M378A1K43DB2-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 79%, 6,043 samples	195x
ACR26D4U9S8ME-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 78%, 1,446 samples	164x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $253

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16