IBM 69Y4438

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardIBM 69Y4438  (all builds)
Memory21.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100301
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 26 '21 at 23:01
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5660
Node 1 Socket 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
68.8% Good
Memory 86.3
1-Core 70.9
2-Core 142
61% 99.6 Pts
4-Core 278
8-Core 435
44% 357 Pts
64-Core 533
33% 533 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 85%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
IBM ServeRAID M5015 239GB
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 55 57 48 24 23 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
134% Outstanding
Read 420
Write 100
Mixed 151
SusWrite 42.1
132% 178 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 5.2
1,452% 9.3 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 134%
Great: 134%
IBM ServeRAID M5015 499GB
465GB free
Firmware: 2.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 14 13 11 9 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.4% Below average
Read 101
Write 9.7
Mixed 30.1
SusWrite 12.4
28% 38.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
77% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x4GB
6 of 18 slots used
24GB DIMM
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
44.5% Average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 18.9
46% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 7
22% 7.57 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 5 4 2 64 0" 1600 1200
Typical 69Y4438 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: IBM 69Y4438

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback