To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	To Be Filled By O.E.M. (all builds)
Memory	1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200629
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jun 27 '21 at 19:23
Run Duration	1686 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	54%

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	54.3% Above average	Memory 81.6 1-Core 63.6 2-Core 137 57% 94.1 Pts	4-Core 149 8-Core 206 22% 178 Pts	64-Core 220 14% 220 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 54.3% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Nvidia(10DE 128B) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 460.89 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	2.26% Terrible	Lighting 1.9 Reflection 3 Parallax 3.3 2% 2.73 fps	MRender 5.4 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 4.2 4% 4.5 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.26% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Origin Inception MLC800 SSD 128GB 47 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 36GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM01.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 69 77 100 65 86 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	37.7% Below average	Read 320 Write 359 Mixed 253 SusWrite 88.7 57% 255 MB/s	4K Read 24.4 4K Write 20.8 4K Mixed 0.7 49% 15.3 MB/s	DQ Read 268 DQ Write 24.5 DQ Mixed 46.7 59% 113 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 37.7% Great: 97%
Seagate ST1000VM002-1CT162 1TB 39,407 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 563GB free Firmware: SC23 SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 128 116 132 115 103 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	69.5% Good	Read 124 Write 134 Mixed 62 SusWrite 119 80% 110 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 143% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 69.5% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 2x4GB 8,612 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	37.2% Below average	MC Read 13 MC Write 13.4 MC Mixed 11.9 36% 12.8 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 9.2 SC Mixed 9.2 28% 9.63 GB/s	Latency 77.5 52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 37.2% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	5	3	60	18.9"	1280 701	GSM1900 19LG3000

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,609 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	722x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	281x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	269x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	619x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	461x
G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples	361x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	137x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	103x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	90x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	500x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	307x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	227x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16