Today's hottest deals

Medionpc MS-7501

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics5.31% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMedionpc MS-7501  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDIONPC MS-7501
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20081219
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJun 29 '21 at 19:16
Run Duration248 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 7750
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
27.9% Poor
Memory 45.3
1-Core 31.9
2-Core 61
29% 46.1 Pts
4-Core 62
8-Core 65.2
8% 63.6 Pts
64-Core 62.8
4% 62.8 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 545
MSI(1462 2315) 3GB
CLim: 720 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.73
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
5.31% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 9.4
Parallax 1.8
5% 5.8 fps
MRender 8.6
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 6.7
6% 7.2 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.31%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$36
561GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 40 38 35 71 49 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
44.5% Average
Read 105
Write 62.9
Mixed 41.2
SusWrite 50.2
48% 64.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
81% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x1GB
4 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
MC Read 5.5
MC Write 3.7
MC Mixed 5.4
14% 4.87 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 4.4
12% 4.03 GB/s
Latency 179
22% 179 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 8: 1R 1G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
8% 3% 73 58 42 60 23.8" 1920 1080 DELA09B DELL P2414H
History: Score 0: 0R 0G 0B | Score 8: 1R 1G 0B
Typical MS-7501 Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Medionpc MS-7501

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 11% - Very poor Total price: $30
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback