Today's hottest deals

Acer TP-SW5-271-63ST

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 79% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAcer TP-SW5-271-63ST  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer TP-SW5-271-63ST
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150722
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 26 '17 at 14:45
Run Duration102 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU0%
CPU Throttled 79%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core M-5Y10c
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
41.1% Average
Memory 55.9
1-Core 45.6
2-Core 111
42% 70.8 Pts
4-Core 154
8-Core 152
20% 153 Pts
64-Core 150
9% 150 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Core M HD 5300
Acer(1025 093D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4312
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
3.21% Terrible
Lighting 3.17
Reflection 4.69
Parallax 4.34
3% 4.07 fps
MRender 5.76
Gravity 3.23
Splatting 6.78
4% 5.26 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 3.21%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon IT L8H-64V2G 64GB
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: F861201 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Read 442
Write 70.9
Mixed 124
46% 212 MB/s
4K Read 13.3
4K Write 23.1
4K Mixed 9.22
44% 15.2 MB/s
DQ Read 129
DQ Write 68.3
DQ Mixed 34.6
43% 77.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
48.5% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 17.4
51% 18 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 11.1
SC Mixed 14.7
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 140
28% 140 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback