Today's hottest deals

MSI A320M GAMING PRO (MS-7A39)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics8.42% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive91.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7A39
MotherboardMSI A320M GAMING PRO (MS-7A39)  (all builds)
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 03 '21 at 07:48
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Memory 83.1
1-Core 111
2-Core 222
78% 139 Pts
4-Core 411
8-Core 638
65% 525 Pts
64-Core 862
53% 862 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5750
PwrHis(1787 200A) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.0
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
8.42% Terrible
Lighting 11.2
Reflection 11.7
Parallax 9.9
9% 10.9 fps
MRender 9.6
Gravity 8.6
Splatting 7.9
7% 8.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.42%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-e 100N 128G 128GB
96GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S062
SusWrite @10s intervals: 413 417 423 424 425 420 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Read 463
Write 366
Mixed 359
SusWrite 420
90% 402 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 26.6
126% 51.6 MB/s
DQ Read 149
DQ Write 274
DQ Mixed 38.9
78% 154 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
55.6% Above average
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 16.2
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 16.8
51% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 75.1
53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 12 10 60 23" 1280 720 PHLC091 237EQPH
Typical A320M GAMING PRO (MS-7A39) Builds (Compare 284 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI A320M GAMING PRO (MS-7A39)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $225
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $270WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback