HP Pavilion Power Laptop 15-cb0xx

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	84% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP Pavilion Power Laptop 15-cb0xx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 836B
Memory	9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180622
Uptime	9.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 03 '21 at 12:04
Run Duration	249 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	39.9% Below average	Memory 62.4 1-Core 25.2 2-Core 50.5 32% 46 Pts	4-Core 97.4 8-Core 134 15% 116 Pts	64-Core 138 9% 138 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 39.9% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? HP(103C 836B) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	0.6% Terrible	Lighting 0.2 Reflection 8.7 Parallax 2.7 0% 3.87 fps	MRender 3.6 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 0.2 2% 2.03 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 0.6% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLW128HEGR-000H1 128GB 8,655 User benchmarks, average bench 176% 56GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXB73H1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 273 156 145 148 146 141 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	84% Excellent	Read 785 Write 745 Mixed 472 SusWrite 168 121% 542 MB/s	4K Read 29.7 4K Write 38.9 4K Mixed 30.8 105% 33.1 MB/s	DQ Read 264 DQ Write 174 DQ Mixed 228 168% 222 MB/s
Poor: 101% ↑ This bench: 84% Great: 317%
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB 71,657 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1.5TB free Firmware: RDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 124 123 128 128 128 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	58.6% Above average	Read 77 Write 119 Mixed 59.5 SusWrite 126 70% 95.5 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 3.6 4K Mixed 0.7 186% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 58.6% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G3B1 859B CT8G4SFS824A.C8FJ 16GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	45.3% Average	MC Read 17.1 MC Write 16.1 MC Mixed 18.7 49% 17.3 GB/s	SC Read 6 SC Write 9.6 SC Mixed 8.6 23% 8.07 GB/s	Latency 121 33% 121 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 45.3% Great: 77%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 41: 4R 5G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
41%	18%	85	86	58	60	15.5"	1920 1080	NCP0029

History: Score 18: 1R 3G 4B | Score 41: 4R 5G 6B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Pavilion Power Laptop 15-cb0xx Builds (Compare 2,461 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Power Laptop 15-cb0xx

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	1,685x
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples	774x
Core i7-6700HQIntelBench 59%, 320,434 samples	2x

GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	1,410x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	985x
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 29%, 105,856 samples	49x

SSD
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBToshiba $33Bench 125%, 44,050 samples	212x
MZVLW128HEGR-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 176%, 8,655 samples	104x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	91x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	241x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	212x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 71,691 samples	149x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 37% - Below average

Total price: $33

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16