Red KVM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics57.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory23.4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 23.4GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemRed KVM  (all builds)
MotherboardRed RHEL-AV
Memory19.8 GB free of 23.4375 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 04 '21 at 21:23
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X 6-Core
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Memory 76.6
1-Core 138
2-Core 273
88% 163 Pts
4-Core 491
8-Core 821
80% 656 Pts
64-Core 1026
64% 1026 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Lighting 71.5
Reflection 74.7
Parallax 68.3
58% 71.5 fps
MRender 66.2
Gravity 72.4
Splatting 68
56% 68.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 60%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 107GB
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,841
Write 2180
Mixed 2,569
1,909% 2,530 MB/s
4K Read 45.4
4K Write 44.9
4K Mixed 52.2
8,523% 47.5 MB/s
DQ Read 108
DQ Write 111
DQ Mixed 120
1,066% 113 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Red Hat Hat 23GB
0, 0 MHz
16384, 7616 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
MC Read 37.4
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 36.8
94% 32.8 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 21.7
SC Mixed 31.3
72% 25.2 GB/s
Latency 87.2
46% 87.2 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 10 8 60 23.1" 1280 720 GSM5872 E2351
Typical KVM Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

System: Red KVM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $250
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback