Asus MAXIMUS V FORMULA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS V FORMULA  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130819
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 07 '21 at 11:18
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-2600K-$785
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Memory 96.6
1-Core 122
2-Core 239
89% 152 Pts
4-Core 402
8-Core 620
65% 511 Pts
64-Core 620
42% 620 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$540
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
105% Outstanding
Lighting 130
Reflection 141
Parallax 130
105% 134 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 134
Splatting 118
106% 122 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 105%
Great: 116%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 308 310 304 305 305 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 477
Write 462
Mixed 387
SusWrite 317
92% 410 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 48.9
171% 62.7 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 362
274% 367 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 108%
Great: 123%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$55
379GB free
Firmware: M3CR032
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 244 241 240 252 252 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
77.5% Very good
Read 260
Write 242
Mixed 244
SusWrite 246
56% 248 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 82.9
4K Mixed 38.9
139% 50.6 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 199
DQ Mixed 185
144% 197 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
72.3% Very good
MC Read 26.1
MC Write 26
MC Mixed 22.4
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 22.7
SC Mixed 22.5
64% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 51.7
77% 51.7 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 5: 1R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
5% 4% 25 332 270 60 31.5" 1366 768 SAM0A7C SAMSUNG
Typical MAXIMUS V FORMULA Builds (Compare 1,393 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS V FORMULA - $349

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $1,036
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $72G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback