Samsung Galaxy Book Go (LTE)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive54.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSamsung Galaxy Book Go (LTE)  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP345XLA-KB1DE
Memory0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210409
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 10 '21 at 15:24
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
Qualcomm, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
35.2% Below average
Memory 54.5
1-Core 38.2
2-Core 76.3
36% 56.3 Pts
4-Core 90.4
8-Core 116
13% 103 Pts
64-Core 116
7% 116 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 38%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung KM5V8001DM-B622 128GB
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 186 200 202 204 206 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 392
Write 197
Mixed 205
SusWrite 189
55% 246 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 29.4
4K Mixed 19.4
68% 22.3 MB/s
DQ Read 158
DQ Write 135
DQ Mixed 134
104% 142 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 6 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB TSOP LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
34.9% Below average
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 12.1
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 13
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 145
28% 145 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback