QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics28.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory61.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 18 '21 at 20:07
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2689 0
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
65.5% Good
Memory 66.7
1-Core 86.1
2-Core 170
61% 108 Pts
4-Core 345
8-Core 689
61% 517 Pts
64-Core 1,550
96% 1,550 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 85D3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.7% Poor
Lighting 36.1
Reflection 40.6
Parallax 37.8
29% 38.2 fps
MRender 36.3
Gravity 38.5
Splatting 27.2
27% 34 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 137GB
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 89 78 87 79 85 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 26% Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM RAM
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.7% Good
MC Read 29.5
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 24
78% 27.2 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 6.7
17% 5.97 GB/s
Latency 109
36% 109 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 223%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 12 9 60 21.7" 1280 720 AOC0CCD 28E850
Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback