Today's hottest deals

MSI B250M MORTAR (MS-7A69)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.57% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive36.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7A69
MotherboardMSI B250M MORTAR (MS-7A69)  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180125
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 21 '21 at 17:30
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4560-$31
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
63.4% Good
Memory 73.2
1-Core 110
2-Core 223
74% 135 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 311
42% 311 Pts
64-Core 308
19% 308 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 4000
HP(103C 0780) 2GB
CLim: 475 MHz, MLim: 702 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 369.09
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.57% Terrible
Lighting 8.3
Reflection 16.9
Parallax 10.9
7% 12 fps
MRender 16.4
Gravity 7.1
Splatting 10.6
9% 11.4 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.57%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba A100 120GB
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFA10.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 30 25 41 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Read 419
Write 52.2
Mixed 74.1
SusWrite 36.4
31% 146 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 6
4K Mixed 9.2
61% 15.2 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SP008GBLFU213N02 04EF TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.3% Average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 12.8
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 14.3
40% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 94.1
42% 94.1 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 19" 1280 720 ACR001A V193W
Typical B250M MORTAR (MS-7A69) Builds (Compare 1,958 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI B250M MORTAR (MS-7A69)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $299
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback