Biostar A320MH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.06% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive26.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardBiostar A320MH  (all builds)
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201105
Uptime7.4 Days
Run DateJul 22 '21 at 12:03
Run Duration349 Seconds
Run User BHR-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$75
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Memory 54
1-Core 72.8
2-Core 165
53% 97.1 Pts
4-Core 282
8-Core 304
39% 293 Pts
64-Core 333
21% 333 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Zotac(19DA 2263) 2GB
CLim: 1071 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
8.06% Terrible
Lighting 8.8
Reflection 10.5
Parallax 12.7
7% 10.7 fps
MRender 13.9
Gravity 12
Splatting 10.6
10% 12.2 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.06%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ransor Starlink 500GB
253GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1120A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.4 267 140 7.2 65 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
26.8% Poor
Read 350
Write 306
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 83.7
42% 190 MB/s
4K Read 8.4
4K Write 11.3
4K Mixed 0.3
19% 6.67 MB/s
DQ Read 102
DQ Write 16
DQ Mixed 0.4
15% 39.5 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 316%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
92GB free
Firmware: KC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 72 74 75 75 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 71.6
Write 73.7
Mixed 45.8
SusWrite 76.4
49% 66.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
105% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 88%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$65
144GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 85 86 89 86 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
44.2% Average
Read 66.3
Write 63.8
Mixed 43.9
SusWrite 87.5
48% 65.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMRA4U300JJJM-8G 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
44.7% Average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 16.6
45% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 15.4
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 147
27% 147 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 47: 6R 3G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
47% 22% 79 111 80 60 23.5" 1920 1080 SAM0D2C C24F390
History: Score 53: 7R 4G 6B | Score 53: 8R 4G 1B | Score 51: 8R 2G 5B | Score 47: 6R 3G 8B
Typical A320MH Builds (Compare 1,807 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Biostar A320MH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $333
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback