Today's hottest deals

Notebook P65_P67SA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics24.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemNotebook P65_P67SA  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook P65_P67SA
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20150722
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateJul 28 '21 at 13:37
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4870HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Memory 77.5
1-Core 111
2-Core 216
75% 135 Pts
4-Core 402
8-Core 548
60% 475 Pts
64-Core 538
33% 538 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 965M
Clevo(1558 6557) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7141
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
24.7% Poor
Lighting 32.2
Reflection 32.9
Parallax 28.7
26% 31.3 fps
MRender 26.6
Gravity 28.8
Splatting 25.1
22% 26.8 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 250GB
156GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT21B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 386 295 301 298 286 289 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 444
Write 420
Mixed 371
SusWrite 309
87% 386 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 75.2
4K Mixed 47.9
152% 52.2 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 352
266% 358 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 100%
Great: 122%
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
921GB free
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 452 445 431 437 440 443 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 445
Write 420
Mixed 374
SusWrite 441
95% 420 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 75.3
4K Mixed 40.8
134% 47.9 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 254
217% 319 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 102%
Great: 117%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-1600C11-8GRSL 0420 F3-1600C9-8GRSL 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.5% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 14.5
46% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 14.9
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 85.3
47% 85.3 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P65_P67SA Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Notebook P65_P67SA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback