Fujitsu CELSIUS W550power

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive61.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS W550power  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3417-A2
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170515
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 30 '21 at 02:19
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 57%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1275 v5
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
69% Good
Memory 74.2
1-Core 102
2-Core 176
68% 118 Pts
4-Core 351
8-Core 464
52% 407 Pts
64-Core 530
33% 530 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 69%
Great: 89%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM871b 2.5 7mm 256GB
209GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MVT03D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 193 267 267 280 311 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
61.4% Good
Read 299
Write 248
Mixed 202
SusWrite 251
56% 250 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 38.6
4K Mixed 17.8
68% 24.2 MB/s
DQ Read 306
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 201
179% 268 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GU7CJR8N-VK 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
62.8% Good
MC Read 23.7
MC Write 24.7
MC Mixed 20.1
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 17.1
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 92.1
44% 92.1 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback