Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results


Gaming 96% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 88% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	164% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus X99-A/USB 3.1 (all builds)
Memory	24.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190710
Uptime	3.7 Days
Run Date	Jul 30 '21 at 14:42
Run Duration	241 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	87.7% Excellent	Memory 90.1 1-Core 116 2-Core 238 84% 148 Pts	4-Core 459 8-Core 761 74% 610 Pts	64-Core 975 60% 975 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 87.7% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$245 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Asus(1043 85AA) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.41 Performing below potential (71^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	104% Outstanding	Lighting 132 Reflection 144 Parallax 132 107% 136 fps	MRender 117 Gravity 137 Splatting 120 102% 125 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$250 40,327 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 86GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 533 493 479 481 469 470 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	164% Outstanding	Read 1,821 Write 808 Mixed 602 SusWrite 487 204% 930 MB/s	4K Read 35.2 4K Write 86.3 4K Mixed 43.3 154% 54.9 MB/s	DQ Read 361 DQ Write 242 DQ Mixed 338 242% 314 MB/s
Poor: 131% ↑ This bench: 164% Great: 243%
Transcend TS1TSSD370S 1TB 494 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 214GB free Firmware: O0918B SusWrite @10s intervals: 411 410 407 410 412 412 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	90.9% Outstanding	Read 475 Write 404 Mixed 299 SusWrite 410 89% 397 MB/s	4K Read 22.3 4K Write 70.3 4K Mixed 31.5 111% 41.4 MB/s	DQ Read 273 DQ Write 286 DQ Mixed 194 170% 251 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 90.9% Great: 110%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 65GB free Firmware: EXM04B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 4,834 Write 4,922 Mixed 4,755 1,082% 4,837 MB/s	4K Read 184 4K Write 132 4K Mixed 137 524% 151 MB/s	DQ Read 434 DQ Write 319 DQ Mixed 369 278% 374 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25 19,988 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1TB free Firmware: 01.03B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 104 105 105 106 104 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	62.7% Good	Read 114 Write 108 Mixed 73.6 SusWrite 105 74% 100 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 168% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 62.7% Great: 65%
ST6000VN 0041-2EL11C 6TB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 612GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.4 0.3 5.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	36.9% Below average	Read 149 Write 161 Mixed 99.9 SusWrite 1.3 130% 103 MB/s	4K Read 12.8 4K Write 3.9 4K Mixed 1.1 218% 5.93 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 36.9% Great: 95%
WDC WD20 EARX-00PASB0 2TB 130 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 239GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 76 64 83 79 87 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	35.9% Below average	Read 87.4 Write 79.4 Mixed 73 SusWrite 77.6 107% 79.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.6 91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 35.9% Great: 48%
C300-CTF DDAC128MAG 128GB 81GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 75 66 80 80 88 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	192% Outstanding	Read 286 Write 138 Mixed 179 SusWrite 77.8 206% 170 MB/s	4K Read 18.7 4K Write 41.9 4K Mixed 10.8 1,862% 23.8 MB/s	DQ Read 23 DQ Write 61.1 DQ Mixed 11.6 2,558% 31.9 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x8GB-$140 4,858 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	120% Outstanding	MC Read 48 MC Write 43.9 MC Mixed 48.4 134% 46.8 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 22.6 SC Mixed 25.4 63% 21.9 GB/s	Latency 67.1 60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 120%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 21: 2R 3G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
21%	21%	33	109	6	60	27.9"	2560 1440	ACI28A7 ASUS MG28U

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,293 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 65%

Destroyer

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 57%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	764x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	195x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	91x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	118x
GTX 1080Nvidia $245Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	115x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	109x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	87x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	51x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	40x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	43x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	27x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x8GBCorsair $140Bench 87%, 4,858 samples	26x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $357

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16