Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 886 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU01, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	64.6% Good	Memory 72.9 1-Core 81.7 2-Core 152 60% 102 Pts	4-Core 302 8-Core 683 57% 493 Pts	64-Core 2,716 168% 2,716 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 74%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2009)-$79 42,987 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 242GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 11 15 12 16 10 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	18.4% Very poor	Read 51.3 Write 13 Mixed 17.6 SusWrite 12.8 17% 23.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.5 80% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 18.4% Great: 41%
Generic- USB3.0 CRW -SD 197GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 70GB free, PID 0326 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 13 8 21 21 20 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	15.8% Very poor	Read 67.9 Write 32.9 Mixed 7 SusWrite 19 35% 31.7 MB/s	4K Read 7.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 29% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 15.8% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 18ASF1G72PZ-2G1B1 8x8GB 33 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 8 of 16 slots used 64GB DIMM DRAM clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	117% Outstanding	MC Read 57.8 MC Write 42.3 MC Mixed 42 135% 47.4 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 15.4 SC Mixed 18.1 43% 15.2 GB/s	Latency 94.9 42% 94.9 ns
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 117%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	11	9	64	0"	1028 720

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v31stBench 63%, 2,624 samples	2x
Xeon E5-2603 v4IntelBench 58%, 203 samples	1x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v41stBench 64%, 420 samples	1x

GPU
FirePro V5800 (FireGL) Graphics AdapterATIBench 9%, 675 samples	3x
Radeon HD 5670AMDBench 6%, 18,196 samples	1x

SSD
Green 480GB (2018)WD $69Bench 48%, 25,452 samples	1x

RAM
HMA42GR7AFR4N-TF Samsung M393A2G40DB0-CPB 32GBHynixBench 49%, 14 samples	3x
18ASF1G72PDZ-2G3B1 1x8GBMicronBench 34%, 5 samples	1x

Value: 13% - Very poor

Total price: $69