Asus G20BM_A68

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Surfboard	Desktop 55% Yacht	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	28.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	60.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus G20BM_A68 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK G20BM_A68
Memory	12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170219
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 04 '21 at 17:22
Run Duration	171 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	29%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-770K (2014 D.Ka) 1,664 User benchmarks, average bench 44% FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	42.4% Average	Memory 51.6 1-Core 64.5 2-Core 120 45% 78.6 Pts	4-Core 192 8-Core 193 26% 193 Pts	64-Core 193 12% 193 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% PNY(196E 1138) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1468 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.41 Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28.9% Poor	Lighting 41.8 Reflection 45.3 Parallax 42.8 34% 43.3 fps	MRender 38.3 Gravity 40.6 Splatting 0.2 19% 26.4 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 28.9% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SB8W128G 128GB 279 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 76GB free (System drive) Firmware: X6107000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 112 105 105 104 106 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	60.1% Good	Read 330 Write 114 Mixed 197 SusWrite 108 41% 187 MB/s	4K Read 29 4K Write 63.5 4K Mixed 19.6 103% 37.4 MB/s	DQ Read 253 DQ Write 199 DQ Mixed 201 157% 218 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 90%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82 64,359 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 140 139 146 146 146 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	83.2% Excellent	Read 149 Write 135 Mixed 71.1 SusWrite 140 91% 124 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.5 130% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 83.2% Great: 86%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 M471B1G73EB0-YK0 16GB 915 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	35.1% Below average	MC Read 16.1 MC Write 8 MC Mixed 15.1 37% 13.1 GB/s	SC Read 7 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 9.7 22% 7.87 GB/s	Latency 155 26% 155 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 7: 1R 0G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
7%	14%	22	104	5	60	24"	1920 1080	BNQ7840 BenQ G2420HD

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical G20BM_A68 Builds (Compare 42 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 15%

Surfboard

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

System: Asus G20BM_A68

CPU
FX-770K (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 44%, 1,664 samples	36x
Athlon X4 845AMD $50Bench 45%, 6,391 samples	2x
A10-7800 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 41%, 15,719 samples	2x

GPU
R9 270AMD $140Bench 24%, 47,409 samples	13x
Radeon R9 370AMDBench 25%, 513 samples	6x
Radeon R9 255AMDBench 8%, 591 samples	5x

SSD
520 Series 180GBIntel $132Bench 72%, 14,258 samples	4x
RBU-SC100S37128GD 128GBKingstonBench 58%, 1,846 samples	4x
PM830 256GBSamsungBench 66%, 2,468 samples	2x

RAM
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 30,280 samples	9x
M471B5173EB0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 46%, 19,666 samples	7x
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 52%, 34,976 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 24% - Poor

Total price: $272

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16