Asus CROSSBLADE RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics81% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus CROSSBLADE RANGER  (all builds)
Memory16.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150430
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateAug 05 '21 at 00:55
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 43%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7890K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$889
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
47.9% Average
Memory 65.3
1-Core 65.2
2-Core 111
49% 80.5 Pts
4-Core 177
8-Core 184
24% 180 Pts
64-Core 186
12% 186 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81% Excellent
Lighting 99.8
Reflection 111
Parallax 111
81% 107 fps
MRender 96
Gravity 99
Splatting 98.5
80% 97.8 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 81%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ct240bx5 0 240GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6C
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 407
Write 311
Mixed 9.5
53% 242 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 0.3
39% 9.83 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 87%
Samsung 860 EVO 250G 250GB
39GB free
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 268 278 288 289 290 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Read 408
Write 345
Mixed 350
SusWrite 277
78% 345 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 63.1
4K Mixed 41.9
137% 46.1 MB/s
DQ Read 267
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 250
187% 250 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 122%
JMicron Generic 500GB
122GB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 188 208 221 224 220 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
167% Outstanding
Read 264
Write 234
Mixed 244
SusWrite 203
317% 236 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 26
4K Mixed 21
1,665% 21.7 MB/s
DQ Read 27.6
DQ Write 52.3
DQ Mixed 37.7
3,164% 39.2 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 167%
Great: 167%
TO Exter nal USB 3.0 256GB
169GB free, PID a001
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 21 8.7 11 8.1 10 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
67.2% Good
Read 265
Write 97.3
Mixed 30.7
SusWrite 15.8
101% 102 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 7.1
4K Mixed 0.2
303% 7.37 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 230%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ares DDR3 2133 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.1% Below average
MC Read 12
MC Write 8.6
MC Mixed 11.6
31% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 8.4
20% 6.93 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CROSSBLADE RANGER Builds (Compare 82 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus CROSSBLADE RANGER - $897

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $1,119
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback