Casper NIRVANA NOTEBOOK

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive72.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 91% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemCasper NIRVANA NOTEBOOK  (all builds)
MotherboardCASPER CASPER NIRVANA NOTEBOOK
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130411
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 09 '21 at 16:47
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 50%
CPU Throttled 91%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Memory 58.5
1-Core 33.1
2-Core 64.4
34% 52 Pts
4-Core 108
8-Core 111
14% 109 Pts
64-Core 117
7% 117 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 69%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Asint AS528 128GB
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0929A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 308 285 361 396 395 372 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Read 454
Write 393
Mixed 374
SusWrite 353
88% 393 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 44.6
4K Mixed 18.9
79% 28.1 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 211
DQ Mixed 39.9
72% 140 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8AAD DDR3 1600 4G 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49% Average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 17.7
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 7.7
21% 7.37 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NIRVANA NOTEBOOK Builds (Compare 2,352 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Casper NIRVANA NOTEBOOK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback