Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Dell VxRail P580N

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	73.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	384GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 384GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Dell VxRail P580N (all builds)
Motherboard	Dell 0TF0V7
Memory	370.8 GB free of 384 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210423
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 12 '21 at 02:09
Run Duration	336 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Platinum 8276 6 User benchmarks, average bench 78% CPU1, 1 CPU, 28 cores, 56 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	77.4% Very good	Memory 83.6 1-Core 95.9 2-Core 192 71% 124 Pts	4-Core 383 8-Core 722 66% 552 Pts	64-Core 2,944 182% 2,944 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 77.4% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Dellboss VD 240GB 81 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 203GB free (System drive) Firmware: MV.R00-0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 218 234 234 234 248 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	73.6% Very good	Read 408 Write 251 Mixed 228 SusWrite 230 62% 279 MB/s	4K Read 25.5 4K Write 66.2 4K Mixed 27.7 109% 39.8 MB/s	DQ Read 261 DQ Write 185 DQ Mixed 175 144% 207 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 78%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$71 92,081 User benchmarks, average bench 224% 424GB free Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1518 1576 1872 1836 1760 923 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	300% Outstanding	Read 1495 Write 2,216 Mixed 1,700 SusWrite 1,581 396% 1,748 MB/s	4K Read 63.6 4K Write 183 4K Mixed 91.5 310% 113 MB/s	DQ Read 1,148 DQ Write 958 DQ Mixed 1,048 787% 1,052 MB/s
Poor: 144% ↑ This bench: 300% Great: 295%
Micron_7300_MTFDHBE7T6TDF 7.5TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 214% 7TB free Firmware: 95420100 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1809 1807 1802 1802 1804 1799 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	275% Outstanding	Read 1,246 Write 1,837 Mixed 981 SusWrite 1,804 333% 1467 MB/s	4K Read 37 4K Write 179 4K Mixed 56.4 223% 90.8 MB/s	DQ Read 1,289 DQ Write 812 DQ Mixed 1,055 785% 1,052 MB/s
Poor: 173% ↑ This bench: 275% Great: 275%
Samsung MZQLB960HAJR-00007 960GB 94 User benchmarks, average bench 268% 2.5TB free Firmware: EDA5202Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 726 733 726 720 718 721 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	183% Outstanding	Read 1,482 Write 1,073 Mixed 1,484 SusWrite 724 267% 1,191 MB/s	4K Read 49.6 4K Write 35.8 4K Mixed 41.4 147% 42.3 MB/s	DQ Read 1,155 DQ Write 377 DQ Mixed 564 469% 699 MB/s
Poor: 185% ↑ This bench: 183% Great: 315%
Samsung MZQLB960HAJR-00007 960GB 94 User benchmarks, average bench 268% 2.5TB free Firmware: EDA5202Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 734 730 731 739 739 737 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	184% Outstanding	Read 1,454 Write 1,093 Mixed 1,561 SusWrite 735 272% 1,211 MB/s	4K Read 49.8 4K Write 35.6 4K Mixed 41.3 147% 42.2 MB/s	DQ Read 1,209 DQ Write 390 DQ Mixed 586 488% 728 MB/s
Poor: 185% ↑ This bench: 184% Great: 315%
DELL IDSDM 64GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 60GB free, PID a101 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 38 38 38 38 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	22.8% Poor	Read 40.5 Write 36.5 Mixed 38.1 SusWrite 37.5 52% 38.2 MB/s	4K Read 4.6 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 3.2 211% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 22.8% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown HMAA8GR7AJR4N-WM 6x31.8GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 6 of 48 slots used 191GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	33.8% Below average	MC Read 11.6 MC Write 13.3 MC Mixed 10.7 34% 11.9 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 5.8 18% 6.27 GB/s	Latency 74.1 54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 35%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	6	14	4	64	0"	1024 768

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $298	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback