Today's hottest deals

Samsung NC10

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 13.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (98%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung NC10  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NC10
Memory0.8 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1024 x 600 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090414
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 12 '21 at 12:42
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 98%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom N270
U2E1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Memory 25.7
1-Core 3.6
2-Core 3.4
10% 10.9 Pts
4-Core 4.4
8-Core 7
1% 5.7 Pts
64-Core 8.8
0% 8.8 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST9160411ASG 160GB-$60
131GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 32 41 41 57 51 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
27.3% Poor
Read 51.6
Write 44.8
Mixed 32.1
SusWrite 43.4
32% 43 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
76% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 47%
Multi Flash Reader 2GB
2GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 4.9 6.3 6.2 6.2 6.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
2.52% Terrible
Read 6.7
Write 4.5
Mixed 2.8
SusWrite 5.8
6% 4.95 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
4% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.52%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
5.55% Terrible
MC Read 1.5
MC Write 2.2
MC Mixed 1.7
5% 1.8 GB/s
SC Read 0.4
SC Write 2.1
SC Mixed 0.2
3% 0.9 GB/s
Latency 281
14% 281 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 5.55%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback