Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP EliteBook 2740p

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics	0.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	27.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

9 years ago, 9 years ago, 9 years ago.

System	HP EliteBook 2740p (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 7007
Memory	1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140708
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 26 '15 at 12:42
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	UKR-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 M 540 8,329 User benchmarks, average bench 41% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.55 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 72.8 2-Core 101 42% 86.8 Pts	4-Core 176 8-Core 178 24% 177 Pts	64-Core 169 10% 169 Pts
Poor: 27% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 7007) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.64% Terrible	Lighting 0.67 Reflection 0.92 Parallax 0.66 0% 0.75 fps	MRender 1.1 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 1.3 1% 0.97 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.64% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel X18-M 160GB 441 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 33GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2CV102M3 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 12 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 975 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3292 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 354 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 175358 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 65535 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 65535 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 65535 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0	27.5% Poor	Read 225 Write 75.8 Mixed 122 31% 141 MB/s	4K Read 11.2 4K Write 16.2 4K Mixed 4.75 32% 10.7 MB/s	DQ Read 159 DQ Write 56.9 DQ Mixed 4.86 31% 73.7 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 27.5% Great: 42%
ADATA 500GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 78GB free, PID a12a Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	10.7% Very poor	Read 30.1 Write 20.5 Mixed 22.9 30% 24.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 0.57 4K Mixed 0.28 31% 0.45 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.7% Great: 28%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical EliteBook 2740p Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 40%

Speed boat

Workstation

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 2740p

CPU
Core i5 M 540IntelBench 41%, 8,329 samples	1x

GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	1x

SSD
X18-M 160GBIntelBench 30%, 441 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback