Today's hottest deals

Fujitsu FMVA08002

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemFujitsu FMVA08002  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNB26E
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150605
Uptime7.7 Days
Run DateAug 20 '21 at 04:06
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4210M
Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Memory 52.8
1-Core 23.5
2-Core 54.8
29% 43.7 Pts
4-Core 144
8-Core 181
21% 162 Pts
64-Core 181
11% 181 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Fujitsu(10CF 17AB) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5171
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
3.14% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 6.3
3% 4.1 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.9
4% 4.27 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.14%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN128HCHP-00007 128GB
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0106Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 117 122 123 122 126 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
47.4% Average
Read 378
Write 135
Mixed 172
SusWrite 123
44% 202 MB/s
4K Read 12.7
4K Write 27.6
4K Mixed 15.5
54% 18.6 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 166
128% 178 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
45% Average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 16.9
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 8.5
18% 6.4 GB/s
Latency 151
26% 151 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 45%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 15.6" 1280 720 FUJ5612
Typical FMVA08002 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu FMVA08002

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $253Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback