Asus MAXIMUS VII FORMULA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive90.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VII FORMULA  (all builds)
Memory8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150827
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateAug 22 '21 at 04:17
Run Duration316 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Memory 87.7
1-Core 111
2-Core 199
77% 133 Pts
4-Core 371
8-Core 541
57% 456 Pts
64-Core 551
34% 551 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$112
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 212 211 203 204 199 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Read 479
Write 335
Mixed 337
SusWrite 209
76% 340 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 84.4
4K Mixed 43.9
150% 53.5 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 356
246% 299 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
91GB free
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 313 306 112 93 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Read 358
Write 325
Mixed 307
SusWrite 206
67% 299 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 56
4K Mixed 40.2
131% 43 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 216
146% 180 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 124%
Jmicron Generic DISK01 256GB
36GB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 27 27 48 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.4% Below average
Read 328
Write 277
Mixed 229
SusWrite 30.6
48% 216 MB/s
4K Read 12.8
4K Write 20.3
4K Mixed 14.8
49% 16 MB/s
DQ Read 17.1
DQ Write 29.9
DQ Mixed 20.4
16% 22.5 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 42%
Jmicron Generic DISK02 256GB
101GB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 27 27 43 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.6% Below average
Read 331
Write 299
Mixed 243
SusWrite 29.8
50% 226 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 20.8
4K Mixed 14.9
50% 16.2 MB/s
DQ Read 16.3
DQ Write 29.9
DQ Mixed 19.4
16% 21.9 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 33%
Jmicron Generic DISK03 256GB
81GB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 27 27 37 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.2% Below average
Read 326
Write 226
Mixed 202
SusWrite 28.8
43% 196 MB/s
4K Read 12.5
4K Write 20.3
4K Mixed 15.1
49% 16 MB/s
DQ Read 17.8
DQ Write 29.9
DQ Mixed 17.5
15% 21.7 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 34%
Jmicron Generic DISK00 256GB
79GB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 27 27 27 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 2133 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 2133 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.4% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 14.8
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 14.3
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 69.8
57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 75: 8R 9G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
75% 39% 64 305 234 120 0" 1920 1080
History: Score 37: 5R 2G 6B | Score 75: 8R 9G 8B
Typical MAXIMUS VII FORMULA Builds (Compare 625 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII FORMULA - $284

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $917
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback