Today's hottest deals

Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics52.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive26.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190731
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 22 '21 at 08:59
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$85
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
68.8% Good
Memory 72.7
1-Core 96.9
2-Core 190
68% 120 Pts
4-Core 377
8-Core 362
50% 370 Pts
64-Core 375
23% 375 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
Nvidia(10DE 1B84) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Lighting 64.7
Reflection 66.6
Parallax 61.7
53% 64.3 fps
MRender 66.5
Gravity 67.4
Splatting 61.4
53% 65.1 fps
Poor: 47%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 30 107 56 64 99 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26.9% Poor
Read 197
Write 97.3
Mixed 86
SusWrite 90.3
26% 118 MB/s
4K Read 13.3
4K Write 14.9
4K Mixed 10.9
42% 13 MB/s
DQ Read 15.6
DQ Write 16.6
DQ Mixed 14.8
12% 15.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 100%
Hitachi HTS547550A9E384 500GB-$60
303GB free
Firmware: JE3OA50A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 74 74 75 76 76 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 57.8
Write 62.7
Mixed 37.3
SusWrite 74.2
42% 58 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
108% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair ValueSelect DDR4 2400 C16 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
48% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 15.2
46% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 17.1
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 95.3
42% 95.3 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 48%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 12 10 60 23.8" 1280 720 PHLC17C PHL 246E9Q
Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 6,247 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $355
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback