Today's hottest deals

Asus Z97-DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics77.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive98.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus Z97-DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180418
Uptime10.7 Days
Run DateAug 23 '21 at 07:32
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Memory 96.4
1-Core 127
2-Core 250
89% 158 Pts
4-Core 449
8-Core 618
67% 533 Pts
64-Core 592
37% 592 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
Asus(1043 86A6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
77.6% Very good
Lighting 98.7
Reflection 97.4
Parallax 89.2
80% 95.1 fps
MRender 99.5
Gravity 91.4
Splatting 77.6
72% 89.5 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vector 512GB-$400
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 370 376 394 370 325 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
Read 420
Write 397
Mixed 214
SusWrite 370
79% 350 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 38.3
149% 57 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 231
DQ Mixed 187
171% 265 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 112%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
597GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 92 90 93 92 92 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
46.2% Average
Read 69.2
Write 67.5
Mixed 60.8
SusWrite 91.4
53% 72.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
130% 1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 59%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$68
715GB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 130 130 131 131 130 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
74.2% Very good
Read 129
Write 91.5
Mixed 74
SusWrite 130
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 113%
ST4000VN 008-2DR166 4TB
901GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1 0.6 1.1 0.8 0.2 0.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
33.7% Below average
Read 184
Write 177
Mixed 93
SusWrite 0.7
139% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
104% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 74%
ST4000VN 008-2DR166 4TB
907GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 98 100 96 24 69 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 184
Write 172
Mixed 98
SusWrite 81.3
172% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
104% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 74%
ST2000VM 003-1CT164 2TB
668GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 98 99 94 23 70 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44% Average
Read 154
Write 154
Mixed 68.3
SusWrite 80.7
147% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
70% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 44%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR3 1866 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
67.5% Good
MC Read 22.7
MC Write 25.2
MC Mixed 21.4
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 23.5
SC Mixed 21.5
58% 20.4 GB/s
Latency 52.5
76% 52.5 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 16: 1R 3G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
16% 14% 43 112 9 60 31.5" 1920 1080 PHL0000 32PFL4664/F7A
Typical Z97-DELUXE Builds (Compare 630 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-DELUXE - $650

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $1,338
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback