Acer Nitro AN515-54

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	4.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	84% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Acer Nitro AN515-54 (all builds)
Motherboard	CFL Octavia_CFS
Memory	0.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, ,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200511
Uptime	2.7 Days
Run Date	Aug 23 '21 at 17:50
Run Duration	305 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	39%

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9300H 23,588 User benchmarks, average bench 68% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	55.7% Above average	Memory 60.2 1-Core 104 2-Core 172 63% 112 Pts	4-Core 276 8-Core 419 43% 348 Pts	64-Core 490 30% 490 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 55.7% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Acer(1025 1331) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6911 Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	4.87% Terrible	Lighting 5.4 Reflection 5.5 Parallax 5.9 4% 5.6 fps	MRender 6.1 Gravity 5.3 Splatting 9 6% 6.8 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.87% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GB 26,870 User benchmarks, average bench 121% 15GB free (System drive) Firmware: 80002C00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 165 161 155 150 150 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	84% Excellent	Read 768 Write 163 Mixed 275 SusWrite 160 74% 341 MB/s	4K Read 25.2 4K Write 59.4 4K Mixed 26.4 103% 37 MB/s	DQ Read 366 DQ Write 172 DQ Mixed 233 182% 257 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 84% Great: 153%
SanDisk Cruzer 123GB 112 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 29GB free, PID 5530 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 1.9 4.4 1.9 3.9 7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	4.51% Terrible	Read 21.6 Write 1 Mixed 5.5 SusWrite 3.7 8% 7.95 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.1 12% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 4.51% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GB 73,050 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	26.3% Poor	MC Read 7.7 MC Write 11.4 MC Mixed 9.9 28% 9.67 GB/s	SC Read 3.5 SC Write 6 SC Mixed 3.9 13% 4.47 GB/s	Latency 127 32% 127 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 26.3% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 38: 5R 4G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
38%	16%	62	22	4	60	15.5"	1536 864	BOE0818

History: Score 0: 0R 0G 0B | Score 26: 3R 2G 5B | Score 34: 4R 4G 2B | Score 38: 5R 4G 1B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Nitro AN515-54 Builds (Compare 11,809 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-54

CPU
Core i5-9300HIntelBench 65%, 116,682 samples	5,721x
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	2,877x
Core i5-9300HIntelBench 68%, 23,588 samples	2,677x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	6,006x
GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples	3,476x
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples	938x

SSD
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBBench 121%, 26,870 samples	1,217x
Micron_2200_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GBBench 188%, 4,220 samples	1,035x
RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1 512GBKingstonBench 126%, 5,630 samples	746x

RAM
ACR26D4S9S8HJ-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 75%, 2,420 samples	848x
ACR26D4S9S8HJ-8 1x8GBKingstonBench 42%, 4,751 samples	758x
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 48,644 samples	733x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16