Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-16R4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics35.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive143% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star GF63 Thin 9SCXR
MotherboardMSI MS-16R4  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 19 '22 at 21:26
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
44.5% Average
Memory 35.9
1-Core 107
2-Core 181
57% 108 Pts
4-Core 287
8-Core 399
43% 343 Pts
64-Core 421
26% 421 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design
MSI(1462 12BD) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.2225
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
35.5% Below average
Lighting 43.6
Reflection 69.9
Parallax 41.1
36% 51.5 fps
MRender 53
Gravity 40.2
Splatting 39.4
36% 44.2 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 40%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WDC PC SN530 SDB 512GB
0GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21111000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 678 462 429 441 439 437 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
143% Outstanding
Read 1,142
Write 1,234
Mixed 1,030
SusWrite 481
218% 972 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 76.7
4K Mixed 43.1
144% 50.5 MB/s
DQ Read 590
DQ Write 449
DQ Mixed 548
402% 529 MB/s
Poor: 112%
This bench: 143%
Great: 198%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.1% Poor
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 9.9
MC Mixed 7.5
26% 9.17 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 4.5
13% 4.47 GB/s
Latency 222
18% 222 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16R4 Builds (Compare 3,079 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16R4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback