Intel X99

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	129% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Intel X99 (all builds)
Memory	14.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201230
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Aug 24 '21 at 07:35
Run Duration	261 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	23%

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 867 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	61.9% Good	Memory 62.4 1-Core 84 2-Core 145 56% 97.2 Pts	4-Core 329 8-Core 647 58% 488 Pts	64-Core 2,545 158% 2,545 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7450 10,238 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Sapphire(174B 3000) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	1.72% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 2.7 Parallax 2 2% 2.3 fps	MRender 1.9 Gravity 2 Splatting 1.9 2% 1.93 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.72% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
S2000 256GB 80 User benchmarks, average bench 178% 171GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0828A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 687 123 202 112 114 219 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	129% Outstanding	Read 1,201 Write 908 Mixed 860 SusWrite 243 179% 803 MB/s	4K Read 37.9 4K Write 102 4K Mixed 28.9 148% 56.3 MB/s	DQ Read 546 DQ Write 466 DQ Mixed 419 338% 477 MB/s
Poor: 129% ↑ This bench: 129% Great: 233%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$150 200,600 User benchmarks, average bench 336% 1.5TB free Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1206 1136 1115 1186 1186 1167 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	196% Outstanding	Read 1,570 Write 876 Mixed 496 SusWrite 1,166 228% 1,027 MB/s	4K Read 27.8 4K Write 76.1 4K Mixed 32.6 124% 45.5 MB/s	DQ Read 608 DQ Write 457 DQ Mixed 595 428% 553 MB/s
Poor: 223% ↑ This bench: 196% Great: 435%
WD Elements 25A3 12TB 3,390 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 20GB free, PID 25a3 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 38 39 39 39 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	34.6% Below average	Read 38.7 Write 38.6 Mixed 32.4 SusWrite 38.8 51% 37.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 6.6 4K Mixed 1.1 265% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 100%
WD Elements 25A3 12TB 3,390 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 25GB free, PID 25a3 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 83 82 83 71 84 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	60.5% Good	Read 167 Write 171 Mixed 115 SusWrite 81.1 175% 133 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 5.9 4K Mixed 1.4 256% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 100%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 4TB 3,010 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 786GB free, PID 0900 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 14 15 15 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	6.8% Terrible	Read 19 Write 22.7 Mixed 12.7 SusWrite 14.1 23% 17.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.2 18% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 6.8% Great: 53%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 4TB 3,010 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 76GB free, PID 0900 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 45 45 46 48 46 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	31.7% Below average	Read 138 Write 130 Mixed 20.6 SusWrite 45.4 102% 83.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.5 39% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 53%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 4TB 3,010 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 77GB free, PID 0900 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 45 45 46 48 45 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	32.8% Below average	Read 146 Write 142 Mixed 20 SusWrite 45.2 108% 88.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.5 39% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 53%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 4TB 3,010 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 77GB free, PID 0900 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 45 45 46 48 47 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	32.8% Below average	Read 145 Write 142 Mixed 21.2 SusWrite 45.7 108% 88.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.5 40% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 53%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$8 33,725 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 20GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 31 14 14 14 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	35.1% Below average	Read 155 Write 39.8 Mixed 56.7 SusWrite 25.8 75% 69.3 MB/s	4K Read 6.3 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 2.1 156% 3.4 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BLS4G4D240FSE.8FBD2 BLS4G4D240FSE.8FBD2 CT8C4DFS8213.8FA1 CT8C4DFS8213.8FA1 CT8C4DFS8213.8FA1 CT8C4DFS8213.8FA1 24GB 2400, 2400, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	75.5% Very good	MC Read 36.1 MC Write 25.9 MC Mixed 26.8 85% 29.6 GB/s	SC Read 10 SC Write 15.7 SC Mixed 14.4 38% 13.4 GB/s	Latency 121 33% 121 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	17"	1280 720	SAM022B SyncMaster

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99 Builds (Compare 2,287 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 34%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel X99

CPU
Xeon E5-2620 v3IntelBench 66%, 6,890 samples	221x
Xeon E5-2678 v3IntelBench 71%, 6,301 samples	177x
Xeon E5-2670 v3IntelBench 66%, 3,953 samples	110x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	139x
RTX 3060Nvidia $283Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	117x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	98x

SSD
SNV2S1000G 1TBKingstonBench 260%, 75,739 samples	47x
NE-256 256GBBench 159%, 6,044 samples	45x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	37x

RAM
Atermiter 2x8GBUnknownBench 59%, 2,316 samples	231x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	134x
Atermiter 2x16GBUnknownBench 65%, 839 samples	89x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $130

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16