PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 30.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 35.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | Micro-Star MS-7C13 |
Motherboard | MSI H310M PRO-VD PLUS (MS-7C13) (all builds) |
Memory | 12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20180827 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Aug 25 '21 at 01:57 |
Run Duration | 105 Seconds |
Run User | TUR-User |
Background CPU | 4% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
76.5%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
30.3%
Below average
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Longline 120GB
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T092
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 102 6.4 16 49 2.4 MB/s
|
35.3%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 9905702-017.A00G 04EF TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
76.3%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-9400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 529x |
Core i3-9100FIntel $135Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 314x |
Core i7-9700Intel $250Bench 92%, 79,875 samples | 124x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 122x |
RTX 2060Nvidia $296Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 116x |
GTX 1660Nvidia $209Bench 68%, 230,793 samples | 96x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 115% - Outstanding | Total price: $157 |