Today's hottest deals

HP Laptop 17z-ca100

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Laptop 17z-ca100  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 85B3
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190703
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateAug 28 '21 at 04:15
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Memory 70.3
1-Core 91.1
2-Core 141
60% 101 Pts
4-Core 240
8-Core 240
32% 240 Pts
64-Core 241
15% 241 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics
HP(103C 85B3) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.50.02
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
5.3% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 7.7
Parallax 1.4
5% 5 fps
MRender 5.4
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 10.2
6% 7.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.3%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
594GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 53 70 80 76 106 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 93
Write 95
Mixed 59.4
SusWrite 75.5
59% 80.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.8
197% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 79%
WD easystore 2625 2TB
750GB free, PID 2625
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 20 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
23.5% Poor
Read 38.4
Write 35.7
Mixed 26.8
SusWrite 20.8
40% 30.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.3
160% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 64%
WD Elements 1.5TB
72GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 16 20 22 21 22 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Read 40.4
Write 26.6
Mixed 28.9
SusWrite 20.3
37% 29 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
47.9% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 15.2
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 15.5
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 50 38 4 60 17.2" 1280 720 CMN1745
Typical Laptop 17z-ca100 Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 17z-ca100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback