Asrock 970 Extreme4

Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	53.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock 970 Extreme4 (all builds)
Memory	19.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131111
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 04 '21 at 11:17
Run Duration	183 Seconds
Run User	SGP-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	49.5% Average	Memory 69.6 1-Core 52.3 2-Core 91.1 45% 71 Pts	4-Core 161 8-Core 236 25% 199 Pts	64-Core 248 15% 248 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP 26,532 User benchmarks, average bench 41% XFX(1682 E580) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1386 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	53.2% Above average	Lighting 69.2 Reflection 59.9 Parallax 88.4 56% 72.5 fps	MRender 61.6 Gravity 68.1 Splatting 47.1 47% 58.9 fps
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 48%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Shinedisk M667 360G 361GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 40GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q1116A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 222 14 3.7 76 2.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	28% Poor	Read 365 Write 291 Mixed 20 SusWrite 72.7 41% 187 MB/s	4K Read 15.3 4K Write 10.4 4K Mixed 1 30% 8.9 MB/s	DQ Read 21.3 DQ Write 18.1 DQ Mixed 0.2 6% 13.2 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 28% Great: 88%
Adata HV620S 1TB 729 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 809GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 118 128 127 127 127 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	65.8% Good	Read 104 Write 128 Mixed 36.5 SusWrite 126 71% 98.5 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.2 90% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 65.8% Great: 78%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99P5471-016.A00LF 99P5471-016.A00LF Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB 24GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	35.8% Below average	MC Read 14.4 MC Write 11.8 MC Mixed 12.3 37% 12.8 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 6.8 SC Mixed 9.7 24% 8.33 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 35.8% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	7.2"	1280 720	SAM07C0 SAMSUNG

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 970 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 407 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme4 - $107

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	127x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	73x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	31x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	24x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	21x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	15x
850 Evo 120GBSamsung $80Bench 96%, 69,224 samples	13x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	12x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	9x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $396

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16