Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics22.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAsus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX504GD
Memory7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210115
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateSep 04 '21 at 16:28
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User MAR-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Memory 79.5
1-Core 83.4
2-Core 144
62% 102 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 284
30% 239 Pts
64-Core 341
21% 341 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 10C1) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7196
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
22.3% Poor
Lighting 31.1
Reflection 30.6
Parallax 31.8
25% 31.2 fps
MRender 34.5
Gravity 33.5
Splatting 0.3
16% 22.8 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$56
438GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 61 49 45 53 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
35.3% Below average
Read 72.7
Write 77.5
Mixed 50.8
SusWrite 49.9
46% 62.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.1
79% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 70%
Verbatim STORE N GO 16GB
7GB free, PID 0245
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.8 7.5 7.8 8.5 7.6 8.1 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
5.79% Terrible
Read 20.3
Write 1.7
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 8.2
11% 9.68 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.79%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
66.7% Good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 21.7
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 11.9
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 81.5
49% 81.5 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 10 8 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO38ED
Typical TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD Builds (Compare 2,620 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback