ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-Z97-D3H-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics	16.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	86% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Gigabyte Z97-D3H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z97-D3H-CF (all builds)
Memory	12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20150918
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 29 '15 at 14:02
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4690K-$50 229,359 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 114 2-Core 227 77% 170 Pts	4-Core 444 8-Core 444 59% 444 Pts	64-Core 451 28% 451 Pts
Poor: 53% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152 36,698 User benchmarks, average bench 14% EVGA(3842 3652) 1GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5850 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	16.5% Very poor	Lighting 20.5 Reflection 18.4 Parallax 23.5 17% 20.8 fps	MRender 23.8 Gravity 18.8 Splatting 17.4 16% 20 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 16.5% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshib DT01ACA100 1TB 1,368 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 486GB free Firmware: MS2O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 142 142 68 (03) Spinup time 123 123 12897026235 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 225 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 108 108 37 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 171 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 112 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 225 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 225 (C2) HDA temperature 176 176 180389937186 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	16.3% Very poor	Read 153 Write 155 Mixed 137 33% 149 MB/s	4K Read 0.68 4K Write 1.89 4K Mixed 0.21 2% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 16.3% Great: 19%
Inte SSDSC2BF240A5 240GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 138GB free (System drive) Firmware: TG21 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 19 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 42 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 33 100 85902164001 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 3992 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 65535 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 57 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 65535 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 3992 (F2) Unknown 100 100 8538 (F9) Unknown 100 100 620	86% Excellent	Read 509 Write 237 Mixed 286 76% 344 MB/s	4K Read 29.6 4K Write 129 4K Mixed 20.7 140% 59.9 MB/s	DQ Read 269 DQ Write 210 DQ Mixed 46.6 87% 175 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 86% Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$88 40,945 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 753GB free Firmware: CC1H Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 110 99 28305693 (03) Spinup time 98 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 9166 (05) Reallocated sector count 1 1 4153 (07) Seek error rate 43 42 24545842549156 (09) Power-on hours count 78 78 19379 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 16 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4484 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 41 41 59 (BC) Unknown 100 26 25770459223 (BD) vendor-specific 40 40 60 (BE) vendor-specific 63 47 622460965 (C2) HDA temperature 37 53 81604378661 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 53 19 28305693 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 8 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 8 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -32001801303675 (F1) Unknown 100 253 2341075658 (F2) Unknown 100 253 3032033529	60.7% Good	Read 101 Write 110 Mixed 105 79% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.78 4K Write 1.71 4K Mixed 0.53 123% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda Green 1.5TB-$130 20,479 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 749GB free Firmware: CC32 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 1544 (03) Spinup time 93 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6949 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 84 60 322577799 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 8445 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 6153 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BC) Unknown 100 95 146031904830 (BD) vendor-specific 90 90 10 (BE) vendor-specific 67 51 555286561 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1352 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 7401 (C2) HDA temperature 33 49 68719476769 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 29 8 1544 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 7 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 7 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 122251949121929 (F1) Unknown 100 253 1405809131 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1507011861	55.7% Above average	Read 97.1 Write 97.2 Mixed 93.9 72% 96.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.87 4K Mixed 0.71 125% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 55.7% Great: 69%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical GA-Z97-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 1,558 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop

Desktop 84%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z97-D3H-CF

CPU
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	431x
Core i7-4790Intel $132Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	332x
Core i5-4690KIntel $50Bench 70%, 229,359 samples	217x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	170x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	143x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	118x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	53x
MX500 500GBCrucial $53Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	33x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	28x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	67x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	62x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	26x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Above average

Total price: $648

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $239	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback