Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JP_F512JP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive143% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 86% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JP_F512JP  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X512JP
Memory1.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210113
Uptime1 Days
Run DateSep 08 '21 at 00:39
Run Duration198 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 16%
CPU Throttled 86%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1065G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
68.9% Good
Memory 72.2
1-Core 116
2-Core 191
72% 126 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 468
53% 415 Pts
64-Core 472
29% 472 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus G7
Asus(1043 1B2F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9686
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
8.4% Terrible
Lighting 11
Reflection 18.4
Parallax 11.7
9% 13.7 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 12.1
Splatting 11.9
7% 8.33 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.4%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GB
172GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21106000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 284 209 191 187 175 165 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
143% Outstanding
Read 1,145
Write 877
Mixed 998
SusWrite 202
180% 806 MB/s
4K Read 41.9
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 57.8
205% 75.6 MB/s
DQ Read 582
DQ Write 376
DQ Mixed 461
349% 473 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 143%
Great: 171%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
766GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 112 112 109 103 104 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Read 145
Write 115
Mixed 63.3
SusWrite 108
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.6
174% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATS1G64HZ-2G6E1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.1% Below average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 9.9
MC Mixed 10
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 5.4
22% 7.63 GB/s
Latency 96.4
42% 96.4 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 22: 2R 2G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
22% 12% 85 41 1 60 15.5" 1536 864 NCP0046
History: Score 51: 5R 6G 8B | Score 22: 2R 2G 6B
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JP_F512JP Builds (Compare 73 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JP_F512JP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback