Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-F2A75M-HD2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A75M-HD2  (all builds)
Memory6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121012
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 09 '21 at 12:53
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-5400K APU-$120
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
49.8% Average
Memory 83.2
1-Core 66.4
2-Core 98.9
54% 82.8 Pts
4-Core 98.6
8-Core 101
13% 99.6 Pts
64-Core 99.4
6% 99.4 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7540D
AMD(1002 9991) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2201.0
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
2.98% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 4.6
Parallax 3.4
3% 3.9 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 3
Splatting 3.6
3% 3.57 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.98%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar 12 0GB SSD
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 337 284 255 350 363 217 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
69.3% Good
Read 350
Write 326
Mixed 272
SusWrite 301
70% 312 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 78.6
4K Mixed 17.5
96% 39 MB/s
DQ Read 184
DQ Write 208
DQ Mixed 29.6
68% 140 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BA160B Kingston HMT351U6CFR8C 8GB
800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.6% Poor
MC Read 12.9
MC Write 5.3
MC Mixed 9.2
26% 9.13 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 9.6
24% 8.37 GB/s
Latency 74.8
54% 74.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A75M-HD2 Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A75M-HD2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 39% - Below average Total price: $214
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback