Today's hottest deals

LG P430-K.BE44P1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemLG P430-K.BE44P1  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel Base Board Product Name
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110718
Uptime18.3 Days
Run DateSep 09 '21 at 19:47
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2620M
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Memory 83.5
1-Core 88.5
2-Core 141
64% 104 Pts
4-Core 181
8-Core 212
26% 197 Pts
64-Core 182
11% 182 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Device(1854 3001) 2GB
Driver: Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.85% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 3.1
Parallax 1.6
2% 2.3 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 1.3
Splatting 2.8
2% 2.37 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.85%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK6459GSXP 640GB
534GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GT001L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 39 45 61 58 44 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
30.7% Below average
Read 56.6
Write 62
Mixed 18.2
SusWrite 50.2
34% 46.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 45%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 3.0 64GB
43GB free, PID 5597
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 10 9.4 9 12 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
9.76% Terrible
Read 24.3
Write 14.6
Mixed 15.7
SusWrite 10.5
20% 16.3 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1.8
108% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.76%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HB3SU004GFM8DMB33 Kingston 99U5428-046.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.2% Above average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16.3
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 15.5
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 74.3
54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P430-K.BE44P1 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: LG P430-K.BE44P1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback