Asus P8P67-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics9.71% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive56.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8P67-M  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130716
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 13 '17 at 12:28
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User TKM-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$201
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
78% Very good
Memory 89.4
1-Core 98.4
2-Core 189
74% 126 Pts
4-Core 369
8-Core 473
54% 421 Pts
64-Core 470
29% 470 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 78%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
Nvidia(10DE 089C) 1GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1025 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 384.94
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
9.71% Terrible
Lighting 10.9
Reflection 12.8
Parallax 9.25
9% 11 fps
MRender 15
Gravity 11.3
Splatting 14.9
11% 13.8 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.71%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS610S 120GB
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4.C.V Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 487
Write 131
Mixed 199
59% 272 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 64.1
4K Mixed 14
75% 31.1 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 143
DQ Mixed 8.47
44% 100 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 79%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$19
308GB free
Firmware: KC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
62.2% Good
Read 114
Write 103
Mixed 103
80% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.71
4K Write 0.99
4K Mixed 0.74
130% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$19
280GB free
Firmware: KC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 91.6
Write 78.4
Mixed 81.1
63% 83.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 6
4K Mixed 0.44
182% 2.32 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 8.5
MC Mixed 8.1
24% 8.57 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 9.5
SC Mixed 8.7
26% 9 GB/s
Latency 68
59% 68 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 28%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67-M Builds (Compare 395 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67-M - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $578
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback